Brain Injury after Botched Hydrocephalus Surgery
Life can turn in an instant. For some, as we have discussed in our recent blogs, this upheaval happens in the form of a birth injury. There are other instances, though, where these conditions are overcome and patients are able to lead relatively normal, productive lives. It is all the more grievous when later in life, a medical practitioner's negligence becomes the stumbling block for these individuals.
One such case we handled involved a boy with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. These conditions are usually caused by defects during intrauterine development. Spina bifida involves a condition when the spine does not fully close around the spinal cord, resulting in the formation of a myelomeningocele or sac containing the protruding spinal cord and overlying membrane. Ninety percent of patients with myelomeningocele also develop hydrocephalus, or "water on the brain." Hydrocephalus occurs when excessive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) builds up in the ventricles, or cavities, of the brain. If untreated, this causes intracranial pressure to increase, potentially enlarging the skull and causing brain damage, mental disability, or death.
The boy had successful surgery as an infant to repair his spine and place a shunt that would control the pressure in the ventricles of his brain by removing excess CSF. Despite having executive dysfunction, ADHD, and several other medical conditions associated with his hydrocephalus, he either functioned or showed promise of functioning at normal levels in all areas. He was mainstreamed in school, managed to cope with his difficulties, and was expected to graduate with his peers.
At the age of 16, he began to experience periodic severe headaches. After examination, it was found that his shunt, though still functioning, needed revision. Surgery was initially successful, but indications of infection prompted removal of the entire shunt system, requiring placement of a new one at a later date. His surgeon suggested that he could perform an additional and unnecessary procedure, making a 4-5mm hole in the third ventricle for CSF to drain. He did not inform the boy or his parents of all the possible risks, nor did he mention simpler alternatives that were available. During surgery, this doctor also felt he could see well enough to carry out the delicate operation without the assistance of a visualization device. During surgery it became apparent that the attempted repair was a complete failure, and had caused the boy to suffer serious brain injury.
Our law firm's investigation showed that the surgery had been executed in a negligent manner, cutting too deep and in the wrong location, severing the connections between various parts of the brain. Whereas the boy had successfully overcome congenital hydrocephalus and was college-bound, he is no longer fully independent and depends on assistance from others to perform many vital functions. We filed suit on his behalf promptly and recruited top national experts in neurosurgery and neuroradiology to support the case. Fortunately, we were able to achieve a very substantial settlement for this young man and his family, providing help that they desperately need to deal with the problems caused by an unnecessary and cavalier surgical misadventure.



